Remembering comparative neuroanatomy ‘great-grandfather’ Harvey Karten

The National Academy of Sciences member and pioneer in studying non-mammalian vertebrate brains died on 15 July at 89 years old.

Photograph of neuroscientist Harvey Karten.
Set apart: Harvey Karten, who published more than 270 papers in his career, upset conventional thinking in evolutionary neuroscience.
Courtesy of Anton Reiner

As a boy, Harvey Karten attended the Manhattan Talmudical Academy, a boarding school in the Washington Heights neighborhood of New York City. He didn’t much like the all-boys academy, according to Joe Karten, Harvey’s eldest son, and he especially disdained the religion courses, where he had to study long swaths of text.

Karten, who died on 15 July from complications following a cerebral hemorrhage, always preferred science. Sometimes he ditched school and made his way down to the American Museum of Natural History, located alongside the vast green expanse of Central Park. He had his favorite exhibits: the butterfly room, the bird exhibits and the dinosaur hall. He would absorb whatever the museum had to teach him about life on this planet, and then slip back out into the daylight and head to school.

This fascination with the natural world never left him, by all accounts. Karten wanted to make sense of things he could see with the naked eye or through a microscope. “He was very curiosity driven. He just wanted to know,” says Jonathan Erichsen, professor of visual neuroscience at Cardiff University and one of Karten’s former postdoctoral fellows. Knowledge was the point itself; he did not feel his work needed to have an immediate clinical benefit, Erichsen says.

Regardless, throughout his more than 60-year career, Karten discovered major visual and auditory pathways to the forebrain in birds. He replicated that finding in other non-mammalian vertebrates, such as turtles and fish, and he proved that mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrate brains are homologous. This revelation helped solve the evolutionary question of the origins of the mammalian neocortex, altering the future of mammalian cortical system research.

By the end of his life, Karten’s body of work consisted of 279 papers. Erichsen had come to consider him a “great-grandfather” of comparative neuroanatomy.

K

arten was born to Jewish immigrant parents on 13 July 1935 in the Bronx. Before he started school, his family moved across the Hudson River to Jersey City, New Jersey, where his father became a shopkeeper. The shop struggled, and the family sank their resources and hopes into Karten, the firstborn male. He spent most of his childhood in Manhattan’s boarding schools, in the shadow of World War II. He grew up “knowing that his relatives are being killed in the Holocaust,” Joe Karten says.

Karten took advantage of what the city had to offer him. There was the natural history museum, of course, and New York’s other cultural institutions. He listened to classical music on the Metropolitan Opera Saturday Matinee radio broadcast. His family wanted him to pursue medicine, and so Karten went down that path, graduating from Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx. A medical internship in Salt Lake City and then a medical residency in psychiatry in Denver followed.

While in Denver, Karten applied for a position at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Washington, D.C. Perhaps his desire to explore basic science still nagged at him. He won the position and in 1961— against his family’s wishes—left his residency for the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

In the lab, Karten found his calling, Erichsen says. “He was never happier than when he was in front of a microscope.” What started as an 18-month position at the NIH turned into three years, and Karten worked alongside neuroscientists who would be responsible for changing the future of neuroanatomical research. Walle Nauta, for instance, pioneered silver degeneration staining to visualize neurons and trace axonal pathways. David Hubel, a postdoctoral fellow at Walter Reed, went on to win a Nobel Prize for his co-discovery that ocular dominance occurs during the critical period after birth. And Robert Galambos, an early pioneer of audio and visual processing in the brain, eventually founded the neuroscience program at the University of California, San Diego.

But Karten found other interests, too. In 1964, he married a woman he met through work: Elizabeth Bunim, the daughter of Joseph Bunim, former director of the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases. The couple had three sons. The family camped, hiked and skied, exploring the beauty of nature away from the viewfinder of a microscope.

I

n 1965, Karten became a research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Evolutionary neuroscience literature before the 1960s largely centered around the idea that mammalian brains had complex cortical systems, whereas non-mammalian brains were simpler. Karten didn’t buy that argument. He voiced his skepticism to former colleague Ashley Juavinett, she says, asking her how, if non-mammals’ brains were so simple, did they deal with auditory and visual cues?

Educated on Nauta’s silver degeneration staining technique, Karten began to use pathway tracing to study the pigeon brain. In 1967, he and William Hodos published a stereotaxic atlas of the organ, still Karten’s most cited work. Karten repeated each axonal tracing experiment to section the pigeon brain in sagittal, coronal and horizontal planes—an approach that Luis Puelles, professor of neuroanatomy at the University of Murcia, described as “unique” for its rigor, and consistent with Karten’s overall work.

Equipped with a better understanding of non-mammalian brain morphology, Karten then investigated the phylogeny of mammalian brains. He showed that the visual system of bird brains is shockingly similar to that of mammalian brains, and he defined the presence of auditory, visual and sensorimotor pathways in avian brains. He demonstrated the presence of cortical neurons in non-mammalian vertebrates, and he also proposed that cortical development might occur through the tangential, and not radial, migration of neurons, which has since been proved true in some brain regions.

This work upset conventional thinking in evolutionary neuroscience, drawing both praise and criticism. Anton Reiner, a former postdoctoral fellow in Karten’s lab and frequent collaborator, called Karten’s finding revolutionary. “The people who were the major figures in the field didn’t like this,” he says. “This smart aleck, young guy who was telling them they’re all wrong. So for a while, by the established people in the field, he was somewhat blackballed.” Karten went on to show at molecular, structural and connectivity levels how non-mammalian and mammalian brains are homologous, proving the avian brain’s evolutionary relationship to the development of the neocortex in mammals.

Photograph of neuroscientist Harvey Karten.
50 plus: Karten’s research career spanned more than five decades; he retired in 2016.
Courtesy of Suzanne Stensaas

When Karten joined the faculty at Stony Brook University in 1974, his lab was one of the first to take advantage of several new methods, including injecting tracers into brain tissue to map neuronal projections and connections, and, later, immunocytochemistry. Working with Bill Eldred, professor emeritus of biology at Boston University and a former postdoctoral fellow in Karten’s Stony Brook lab, Karten developed a technique to achieve good fixation in immunocytochemistry protocols without destroying immunoreactivity or preventing penetration of antibodies into the tissue.

Later, at the University of California, San Diego, Karten identified visual circuits in non-mammals that had not yet been studied in mammals, and he continued to show the diversity of amacrine cells, interneurons found in the retina. He also became an advocate for free access to online archives and contributed to the development of BrainMaps.org, which holds high-resolution images of the brains of different species. In 2015, Karten was elected to become a member of the National Academy of Sciences, and in 2016 he retired from the university.

“There wasn’t any part of the brain that he hadn’t dabbled in at some point and come up with something interesting, and I think that really sets him apart,” Erichsen says.

K

arten’s last published paper came out in May of this year and reached back to the beginning of his career, some 50 years prior. In 1973, Karten published a study on the neuronal connections of the basal ganglia of the pigeon. The work showed that the pigeon basal ganglia are wired a lot like the mammalian basal ganglia except for one circuit, the lateral spiriform nucleus (SpL), which has no corresponding connection in mammals.

The 1973 paper intrigued Reiner, a young researcher at the time, and he remained curious about the avian basal ganglia to the SpL pathway throughout his career. This year, Reiner, now professor emeritus of anatomy and neurobiology at the University of Tennessee, published a follow-up study that elaborates on the functions of SpL circuits in birds and concludes it is likely a direct pathway by which the basal ganglia exert motor control in non-mammalian tetrapods. The work, Reiner says, is meant to honor Karten and Hodos, Karten’s co-author on the stereotaxic atlas of the pigeon brain, and both men are listed as co-authors.

Karten had a laugh that could be heard from across the room. Richard Kanner, whose wife was a neuroscientist and introduced him to Karten, describes the laugh as more of a roar. Still, Karten could be exacting with his peers, at times explaining or questioning results to the point of exhaustion. He asked pointed questions during talks and meetings, put on performative presentations, and sometimes audibly commented on a talk while the speaker was at the lectern, says Tom Finger, professor of neuroscience at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and Karten’s second graduate student at MIT. His energy helped set him apart. “He was enthusiastic about anything that he was doing at the time,” Finger says.

These qualities made him “a great person to be around for growing yourself as a scientist,” Reiner says.

After retirement, in his early 80s, Karten was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease, but he remained involved with the scientific community, attending meetings and conferences and conferring with colleagues. He also spent more time bird-watching and on photography, capturing the essence of the animals he had spent much of his life working to understand.

Two days before Karten died, on 13 July, his family says they threw him an 89th birthday celebration. His wife Elizabeth was absent, having died in 2014, but two of his sons and their families came to the house. They helped get his wheelchair outside. Someone had brought chocolate mousse, and Karten ate some of that. The day was sunny and pleasant, and they gathered around him to sing “Happy Birthday.”

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Catch up on what you may have missed from our recent coverage.