Lauren N Ross.

Lauren N. Ross

Associate professor of logic and philosophy of science
University of California, Irvine

Lauren N. Ross is associate professor of logic and philosophy of science at the University of California, Irvine. Her research concerns causal reasoning and explanation in the life sciences, primarily neuroscience and biology.  One main area of her research explores causal varieties—different types of causes, causal relationships and causal systems in the life sciences. Her work identifies the features characteristic of these causal varieties and their implications for how these systems are studied, how they figure in scientific explanations and how they behave. A second main area of work focuses on types of explanation in neuroscience and biology, including distinct forms of causal and noncausal explanation.

Ross’ research has received a National Science Foundation CAREER award, a Humboldt Experienced Researcher Fellowship, a John Templeton Foundation Grant, and an Editor’s Choice Award at the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.  Recent publications include “Causation in neuroscience: Keeping mechanism meaningful” with Dani S. Bassett in Nature Reviews Neuroscience and a forthcoming book, “Explanation in Biology” (Cambridge University Press: Elements Series).

Explore more from The Transmitter

Illustration of an open journal featuring lines of text and small illustrations of eyes and mouths.

Links between tuberous sclerosis complex and autism, and more

Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 17 August.

By Jill Adams
18 August 2026 | 1 min read
Taylor Bolt photo illustration.

The fun and flexibility of data science

Taylor Bolt spent his Ph.D. and postdoc digging through brain imaging data for clues to cognition. In industry, the datasets are different but the joy of answering questions with data remains.

By Katie Moisse
18 August 2026 | 7 min read
Two trajectories cross over each other showing areas of alignment and misalignment.

Mind over metrics: How can we tell if two brains (or AI models) are alike?

The ability to record from large populations of neurons has triggered the development of myriad methods for comparing them. But we’re still grappling with how to convert measures of likeness into a better mechanistic understanding.

By Alex Williams
17 August 2026 | 7 min read