Emily Singer commissions and edits scientist-written content and develops new resources for the community. She joined The Transmitter in 2023 and has previously held a variety of editorial roles at the Simons Foundation, including editor for neuroscience collaborations, and senior biology writer and contributing editor at Quanta Magazine. Before joining the foundation, she was biomedical editor at Technology Review.
Emily Singer
Chief opinion editor
The Transmitter
From this contributor
Amid funding uncertainty, graduate neuroscience programs in the U.S. adapt
By
Emily Singer
9 November 2026 | 15 min read
The changing nature of the neuroscience Ph.D.
By
Emily Singer
9 November 2026 | 7 min read
Neuroscience gave AI its start. What happens now?
By
Emily Singer
27 October 2026 | 10 min read
Amid funding uncertainty, neuroscientists report a mix of cynicism, persistence
By
Emily Singer
28 August 2026 | 5 min read
Education
- Certificate in science communication, University of California, Santa Cruz
- B.A. in biology, University of California, Santa Cruz
Fellowships
- AAAS Mass Media Fellowship
Explore more from The Transmitter
Language development during the first 1,000 days; and more
Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 9 November.
Language development during the first 1,000 days; and more
Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 9 November.
By
Jill Adams
10 November 2026 | 2 min read
What ‘Brain Flows’ gets right
Michael W. Cole’s new book makes a convincing case that the dynamic movement of signals underpins just about everything the brain does, though it misses mention of relevant theoretical and single-cell work.
What ‘Brain Flows’ gets right
Michael W. Cole’s new book makes a convincing case that the dynamic movement of signals underpins just about everything the brain does, though it misses mention of relevant theoretical and single-cell work.
By
Daniel Graham
10 November 2026 | 6 min read
Rethinking neuroscience graduate education in the age of AI
What knowledge from traditional training protocols needs to be maintained, what can be discarded, and what new types of training should be introduced? Six neuroscientists weigh in.
Rethinking neuroscience graduate education in the age of AI
What knowledge from traditional training protocols needs to be maintained, what can be discarded, and what new types of training should be introduced? Six neuroscientists weigh in.
By
Mark Goldman
9 November 2026 | 17 min read