Headshot of Amy Arnsten.

Amy F.T. Arnsten

Albert E. Kent Professor of Neuroscience
Yale University

Amy F.T. Arnsten is Albert E. Kent Professor of Neuroscience at Yale University. She studies the molecular regulation of higher cortical circuits in primates, working to identify the unique mechanisms needed for higher cognition that also confer vulnerability to stress, inflammation and aging, which increase the risk of cognitive disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease.

Arnsten received her B.A. in neuroscience with honors from Brown University in 1976 and her Ph.D. in neuroscience from the University of California, San Diego in 1981, with postdoctoral fellowships at the University of Cambridge with Susan Iversen, and then at Yale University with Patricia Goldman-Rakic. She became assistant professor at Yale in 1986.

She is a member of the National Academy of Medicine and received the Goldman-Rakic Prize for Outstanding Achievement in Cognitive Neuroscience. Much of her research focuses on the prefrontal cortex, a recently evolved brain region that subserves higher cognition and top-down control, comparing this cortex with the vulnerable entorhinal cortex and the resilient primary visual cortex. Her lab discovered the narrow inverted U in both dopamine and noradrenergic actions in the prefrontal cortex, and the intracellular signaling mechanisms that take the prefrontal cortex “off-line” during uncontrollable stress exposure that drives atrophy and tau hyperphosphorylation. Arnsten’s research has led to the development of guanfacine (Intuniv) for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other prefrontal conditions. Her recent work includes studies on treating the cognitive deficits of long COVID and delirium.

Explore more from The Transmitter

Research image of brain organoids with astroglia formation represented in green.

Personalized medicine; astroglia organoids; fast track for fragile X drug

Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 20 January.

By Jill Adams
21 January 2025 | 2 min read
Illustration of clinicians, a pill bottle, a speech bubble and shadowy figures.

Neuroscientists need to do better at explaining basic mental health research

The knowledge gap between scientists, health-care professionals, policymakers and people with mental health conditions is growing, slowing the translation of basic science to new treatments. Like lawyers learning to present a case to the court, scientists should learn to educate nonscientists about their findings.

By Omar Abubaker, Karla Kaun, Eric J. Nestler
21 January 2025 | 7 min read
Grid of human brain scans.

Dose, scan, repeat: Tracking the neurological effects of oral contraceptives

We know little about how the brain responds to oral contraceptives, despite their widespread use. I am committed to changing that: I scanned my brain 75 times over the course of a year and plan to make my data openly available.

By Carina Heller
20 January 2025 | 7 min read