Headshot of Amy Arnsten.

Amy F.T. Arnsten

Albert E. Kent Professor of Neuroscience
Yale University

Amy F.T. Arnsten is Albert E. Kent Professor of Neuroscience at Yale University. She studies the molecular regulation of higher cortical circuits in primates, working to identify the unique mechanisms needed for higher cognition that also confer vulnerability to stress, inflammation and aging, which increase the risk of cognitive disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease.

Arnsten received her B.A. in neuroscience with honors from Brown University in 1976 and her Ph.D. in neuroscience from the University of California, San Diego in 1981, with postdoctoral fellowships at the University of Cambridge with Susan Iversen, and then at Yale University with Patricia Goldman-Rakic. She became assistant professor at Yale in 1986.

She is a member of the National Academy of Medicine and received the Goldman-Rakic Prize for Outstanding Achievement in Cognitive Neuroscience. Much of her research focuses on the prefrontal cortex, a recently evolved brain region that subserves higher cognition and top-down control, comparing this cortex with the vulnerable entorhinal cortex and the resilient primary visual cortex. Her lab discovered the narrow inverted U in both dopamine and noradrenergic actions in the prefrontal cortex, and the intracellular signaling mechanisms that take the prefrontal cortex “off-line” during uncontrollable stress exposure that drives atrophy and tau hyperphosphorylation. Arnsten’s research has led to the development of guanfacine (Intuniv) for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other prefrontal conditions. Her recent work includes studies on treating the cognitive deficits of long COVID and delirium.

Explore more from The Transmitter

Collage of different images of brains and mechanical devices in the background with a suitcase in the foreground.

What are mechanisms? Unpacking the term is key to progress in neuroscience

Mechanism is a common and powerful concept, invoked in grant calls and publication guidelines. But scientists use it in different ways, making it difficult to clarify standards in the field. We asked nine scientists to weigh in.

By Dani S. Bassett, Lauren N. Ross
7 October 2024 | 5 min read
Illustration of a lab with a smoking crater in the middle of the floor.

A scientific fraud. An investigation. A lab in recovery.

Science is built on trust. What happens when someone destroys it?

By Calli McMurray
4 October 2024 | 26 min read
Illustration of hands sewing red and white threads in a DNA-like pattern into a blue-gray fabric.

Untangling biological threads from autism’s phenotypic patchwork reveals four core subtypes

People belonging to the same subtype share genetic variants, behaviors and often co-occurring diagnoses, according to a new preprint.

By Holly Barker
3 October 2024 | 5 min read